Intravenous iron for acute and chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with iron deficiency: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patients with heart failure (HF) and iron deficiency are at increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. We searched databases for randomised controlled trials that compared IV iron to placebo, in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A total of 7,813 participants, all having HFrEF with 3,998 receiving IV iron therapy, and 3,815 control recipients were included. There was a significant improvement in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire favouring IV iron with MD 7.39, 95% CI [3.55, 11.22], p = 0.0002. Subgroup analysis, based on acute and chronic HF, has displayed a sustained statistical significance. Additionally, a significant increase in the left ventricular ejection fraction % was observed, with MD 3.76, 95% CI [2.32, 5.21], p < 0.00001. A significant improvement in 6-min walk test was noted, with MD 34.87, 95% CI [20.02, 49.72], p < 0.00001. Furthermore, IV iron showed significant improvement in NYHA class, peak VO2, serum ferritin, and haemoglobin levels. Finally, despite the lack of difference in terms of all-cause hospitalisation and HF-related death, IV iron was associated with a significant reduction in HF-related, any cardiovascular reason hospitalisations, and all-cause death; which supports the need for implementation of IV iron as a standard of care in patients with HF and iron deficiency.

Sildenafil for congenital heart diseases induced pulmonary hypertension, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Sildenafil was first prescribed for angina pectoris and then for erectile dysfunction from its effects on vascular smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilatation. Recently, sildenafil has been proposed for congenital heart diseases induced pulmonary hypertension, which constitutes a huge burden on children's health and can attribute to fatal complications due to presence of unoxygenated blood in the systemic circulation. Therefore, our meta-analysis aims to further investigate the safety and efficacy of sildenafil on children population. METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, WOS, Embase, and Scopus from inception to April 20th, 2022. Randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of using sildenafil in comparison to a placebo or any other vasodilator drug were eligible for inclusion. The inverse variance method was used to pool study effect estimates using the random effect model. Effect sizes are provided in the form of mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Our study included 14 studies with (n = 849 children) with a mean age of 7.9 months old. Sildenafil showed a statistically significant decrease over placebo in mean and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with MD -7.42 (95%CI [-13.13, -1.71], P = 0.01) and -8.02 (95%CI [-11.16, -4.88], P < 0.0001), respectively. Sildenafil revealed a decrease in mean aortic pressure and pulmonary artery/aortic pressure ratio over placebo with MD -0.34 (95%CI [-2.42, 1.73], P = 0.75) and MD -0.10 (95%CI [-0.11, -0.09], P < 0.00001), respectively. Regarding post corrective operations parameters, sildenafil had a statistically significant lower mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay over placebo with MD -19.43 (95%CI [-31.04, -7.81], s = 0.001), MD -34.85 (95%CI [-50.84, -18.87], P < 0.00001), and MD -41.87 (95%CI [-79.41, -4.33], P = 0.03), respectively. Nevertheless, no difference in mortality rates between sildenafil and placebo with OR 0.25 (95%CI 0.05, 1.30], P = 0.10) or tadalafil with OR 1 (95%CI 0.06, 17.12], P = 1). CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is a well-tolerated treatment in congenital heart diseases induced pulmonary hypertension, as it has proven its efficacy not only in lowering both PAP mean and systolic but also in reducing the ventilation time, intensive care unit and hospital stay with no difference observed regarding mortality rates.

Impact of Cotadutide drug on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The food and drug administration approved many drugs to treat diabetes mellitus, but those drugs do not have a noticeable effect on weight management. Recently, glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist known as Cotadutide serve as a potent drug in treating type 2 diabetes by reducing blood glucose levels and body weight indices. This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of Cotadutide as a treatment for type 2 diabetes individuals. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was done on different databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to capture all relevant articles using an established search strategy. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials that assessed the safety and efficacy of Cotadutide versus placebo or any anti-diabetes drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a BMI between 22 kg/m2 and 40 kg/m2. We conducted the analysis using Revman software version 5.4. RESULTS: We found 663 relevant articles. From which nine studies were included and subjected to qualitative analysis and eight for quantitative analysis. The pooled effect showed that Cotadutide was better than placebo in reducing body weight (kg) (Mean difference (MD) = 3.31, p < 0.00001), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD = 0.68, p > 0.00001), glucose area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC [0-4 h]) (MD = 30.15, p < 0.00001), and fasting plasma glucose over time (mg/dl) (MD = 31.31, p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Cotadutide is safe and effective in reducing plasma glucose levels, HbA1c and body weight in individuals with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD: CRD42021257670 ).

Evaluation of memantine's efficacy and safety in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved drugs that address only autism-related symptoms rather than the underlying impairments. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate  receptor antagonists have recently emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of neurologic and developmental problems, including autism. AIMS: To review (systematically), for the first time, the medical literature that explores the safety in and efficacy of memantine in autism. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A comprehensive electronic search for relevant randomized controlled trials was conducted in four databases. Using RevMan software, we extracted and pooled data as a risk ratio (RR) or normalized mean differences in an inverse variance strategy. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis includes five trials. There was no difference in enhancing social responsiveness when compared to placebo, though memantine lowered the likelihood of anxiety (RR = 0.25; 95% Confidence interval: [0.07; 0.87], p = 0.03). However, memantine aggravated impulsive behaviors. Additionally, in another trial that compared memantine added to risperidone versus risperidone added to placebo, memantine was found to be effective and safe. CONCLUSION: Memantine showed safety in reducing acute symptoms of anxiety and other symptoms encountered in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorders. However, memantine does not improve the core symptoms of autism. Nevertheless, further long-term trials are needed to explore its potential efficacy.